Legal Opinion

McCowen v. City of Evanston

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 1, 1982No. 81 C 866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Donnell McCowen instituted this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976). He alleges that he promised sometime in 1978 to repair and restore defendant Hornean Baxter’s “junk condition” 1966 Porsche automobile. In return, Baxter agreed to assign McCowen a 1961 Mercedes-Benz 190 SL automobile, also in “junk condition.” During the next year or so McCowen worked on both cars. However, for reasons presently unclear, the parties at some point lapsed into serious dispute. On January 28, 1980, Baxter decided to resolve the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell Thomas Palmer, Jr. v. Ted S. Hudson, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. Flower Cab Co. v. PetitteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Barnier v. SzentmiklosiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
  4. Begg v. MoffittDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  5. Koch v. SchneiderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API