Legal Opinion
Cloyd v. Pasternak
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 2003No. 49A02-0209-CV-794PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Perry and Debra Cloyd appeal the trial court’s decision to deny their motion to reinstate their claim after it was dismissed pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 41(E). They contend that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their reinstatement motion under T.R. 41(F) without first conducting a hearing.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 24, 1996, Perry Cloyd’s car was struck by a car being driven by Bette Pasternak. In July 1998, the Cloyds brought suit against Pasternak for negligence. In July 2000, the trial court dismissed their complaint without prejudice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Levin & Sons, Inc. v. MathysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pre-Finished Moulding & Door, Inc. v. Insurance Guidance Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Marriage of Waitt v. WaittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lee v. PughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Principal Life Insurance Co. v. NeedlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- The Estate of Carrie Etta Mills-McGoffney v. Vigo County Prosecutor, Terry Modesitt, Vigo County Adult Protective Services, Jerry Hawk, Angela HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Kimberly A. Congress-JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Melba Polk-King v. Discover BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.