Legal Opinion

Lee v. Pugh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 2004No. 28A04-0312-CV-649PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

David and Naney Lee ("the Lees") filed a complaint against Shelia Pugh and Realty-Group-Sabbagh Pickens, LLC d/b/a Century 21 Realty Group-Sabbagh Pick-ens ("Century 21"), and Paul Diamanti d/b/a Charter Financial Group ("Diaman-ti") in Greene Cireuit Court. The complaint was dismissed with prejudice pursn-ant to Indiana Trial Rule 41(E), and the trial court denied the Lees' motion to reinstate the complaint. The Lees appeal and argue that the trial court abused its discretion when it dismissed their complaint and denied their motion to reinstate.

We affirm.

Facts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Belcaster v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Hill v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Benton v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Indiana Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Lee v. FriedmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chapo v. Jefferson County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Olson v. Alick's Drugs, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Baker MacHinery, Inc. v. Superior Canopy Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. D.L.D. v. L.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Joshua Lindsey v. Adam NeherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API