Arcade Investment Co. v. Gieriet
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action to recover possession of certain premises was begun in justice court, where the plaintiff had judgment. The defendant appealed to the municipal court of St. Paul, where the case was tried before Finehout, J., and a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. From the judgment entered in' pursuance to the verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
Plaintiff and respondent entered into some agreement with the defendant and appellant for the management of an apartment house *278café, and as a part df the agreement gave defendant the free us,e of a certain flat. Defendant subsequently leased another flat in the same building at an agreed price per month from plaintiff’s agents, Cathcart, Price & Co. What purported to be a notice to quit and to terminate the tenancies was served by mail. Defendant was put out by writ of restitution.
The first question raised by the appeal concerns the legal sufficiency of the notice to quit. That notice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alworth v. GordonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Prendergast v. SearleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Morgan v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Collins v. CantyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Dockrill v. SchenkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenny v. Seu Si LunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- King v. Durkee-Atwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Portenier v. WalsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944