Matanuska Valley Farmers Cooperating Ass'n v. Monaghan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Cooperative) appeals from a judgment enforcing the terms of a written contract, the provisions of which, the Cooperative contends, do not govern the relations of the parties.
The Cooperative is a corporation organized under the laws of Alaska for the purpose of buying, selling, handling and processing agricultural products on a cooperative basis for the benefit of its shareholder-members. The members agreed to sell to the Cooperative, and the Cooperative agreed to purchase, all the produce of the members. Such materials as were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitehurst v. . Fcx Fruit and Vegetable ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Saul v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- City Messenger Co. v. Postal Telegraph Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Margolys v. MollenickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- Douglas v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- George Fujimoto v. Rio Grande Pickle Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Sam Rayburn Dam Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio, v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Gilbert v. SextonAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.