Legal Opinion

Sleight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1987No. 86-586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory action brought to determine whether coverage existed under an automobile liability insurance policy. The trial court declared that there was no coverage. We affirm.

The appellant/plaintiff, Cathy Sleight, sued John Butera and his insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, after she was injured in an automobile accident. She claimed the accident was caused by one of Butera’s employees, Joe Kirby, who was driving an automobile belonging to Butera. At the time of the accident, the car was “for sale” and was kept at a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Pettis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Cupps v. UptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. SherrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Encompass Indemnity Company v. Sarkari (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ShanklinDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API