Legal Opinion
Skrodzki v. Marcello
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 19, 2011No. 10-CV-5191 (ADS)(WDW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge.
This ease arises from a contract entered into by Ireneusz Skrodzki (“Szrodzki” or “the Plaintiff’) for the purchase of a crane for delivery to Poland from Mitchell Crane Service, Inc., Mitchell Companies, LLC, and Walt Marcello (collectively, “Mitchell Crane” or “the Defendants”). Based on the Defendants failure to deliver the crane to Poland, Szrodzki commenced the instant action asserting the following causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) unjust enrichment; (3) seller’s breach; (4) deceit; and (5) promissory estoppel.
Pr…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frank Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jonas v. Estate of LevenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Mrs. United States National Pageant, Inc. v. Miss United States of America Organization, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ascento Capital, LLC v. MinervaWorks, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.