Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Gray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was brought by O. L. Babcock, administrator of the estate of Bill Jim, deceased, against Lloyd Cray, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Carl Cray, deceased, to recover damages for the death of Bill Jim, who died as the result of injuries suffered by him in an automobile collision allegedly caused by the negligence of Carl Cray. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

The accident ont of which this litigation arose occurred about 7 o’clock in the evening of July 13, 1938, on the Columbia Eiver highway a few miles east of The Dalles, Oregon.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. TweedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Deitchler v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Knapp v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Snabel v. BarberOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. O'Brien v. Wilmington Provision Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Austin v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Waite v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Waite v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API