State v. Newark
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kapsner, Surrogate Judge.
[If 1] Steven Newark, Jr. appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary, terrorizing, and criminal mischief. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Newark’s motion for a continuance or a dismissal. We further conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to call a police officer to testify in rebuttal and in delaying its ruling whether other officers would be allowed to testify in rebuttal. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In February 2016, the ' State charged Newark with burglary, terroriz ing, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HalvorsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. VanNattaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Great Plains Supply Co. v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. SoucyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. RodriguezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SoucyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.