Legal Opinion

State v. Newark

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2017No. 20160360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Surrogate Judge.

[If 1] Steven Newark, Jr. appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary, terrorizing, and criminal mischief. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Newark’s motion for a continuance or a dismissal. We further conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to call a police officer to testify in rebuttal and in delaying its ruling whether other officers would be allowed to testify in rebuttal. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In February 2016, the ' State charged Newark with burglary, terroriz ing, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HalvorsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. VanNattaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Great Plains Supply Co. v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. SoucyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. RodriguezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. SoucyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API