Legal Opinion

John Deere Company of Kansas City, a Corporation, and Deere & Company, a Corporation v. William T. Graham, and Graham Plow, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1964No. 17441PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 2,627,798 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Patent No. 798”) issued to William T. Graham (plaintiff-appellee) on February 10, 1953, for a “Clamp for Vibrating Shank Plows.” Graham Plow, Inc. (plaintiff-appellee) is a licensee under the patent. The trial court found the patent valid and that Claims 1 and 2 of the patent were infringed by defendants John Deere Company of Kansas City and Deere & Company. From the judgment entered pursuant to findings of fact and conclusions •of law defendants (hereinafter called…

2Cases cited26 opinions

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
Tenneco Chemicals, Inc. v. William T. Burnett & Co., Inc., and Reeves Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
Leonard Kahn v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.