Dixon v. Schermeier
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. B. F. Myres, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
In the year 1873 the United States issued to one F. Hoffman a patent for certain mining ground, *584one hundred and sixty and seventy-seven one hundredths acres in area, called by the parties here the “Hoffman placer claim.” On the easterly and lower side of this, though not quite contiguous to it, lay an- “ other parcel of mining ground containing some fifty-eight acres, and called the “ Smith placer claim.” At the date of said patent there was, and is yet, a water ditch heading about half a mile above the Hoffman claim, and extending through the same to a reservoir a few rods within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Huttemeier v. . AlbroNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Miller v. HoeschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Henderson v. CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Camp Meeker Water System, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. EverettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.