Legal Opinion

Keenheel v. SECURITIES COM'N

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1989No. 114 E.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The issue to be addressed in this appeal is whether the Board of Claims had exclusive jurisdiction to hear and to determine the underlying claim in this matter. This is a direct appeal from an order of the Commonwealth Court, under its original jurisdiction, which transferred to the Board of Claims the action filed by appellant herein, Mark S. Keenheel, whereby he sought to rescind or to nullify an agreement entered into with his former employer, the Pennsylvania Securities Commission (“Commission”). The transfer order issued in response to preliminary objections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ezy Parks v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Keenheel v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Scientific Games International, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Kutnyak v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Roe v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Department of Public Welfare v. Presbyterian Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API