Legal Opinion
Corinthian Investments, Inc. v. Reeder
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 3, 1989No. 88-03100PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment which reformed an agreement for deed. The reformation resulted in the agreement providing that 9½ percent per annum interest is owed on a particular balance due from appellant Corinthian who entered into the agreement as purchaser of the real property involved. Among the issues on appeal is whether the reformation action was barred by so-called “statutory laches” under section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court decided it was not. We agree. We conclude that section 95.-11(6) is not applicable to an equitable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wakulla County v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Tsavaris v. NCNB NAT. BANK OF FLA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Akins v. BetheaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Smith v. BranchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- City of Miami v. GatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McFall v. TRUBEYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Doris Rich Corya, etc. v. Roy SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. Michael Tessenear, Cary L. Tessenear, and Steven K. Jonas, as Trustee of the 4785 Oakfield Circle Trust, Dated, February 28, 2006District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Doris Rich Corya, etc. and Paul J. Rich Sanders, etc. v. Roy SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Doris Rich Corya, etc. v. Roy SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.