Legal Opinion
Barnett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1949No. 11954PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
Appellant, an attorney, was convicted by a jury under Count I of the indictment of selling certain narcotics, and under Count II of conspiracy to sell the same narcotics contrary to the provisions of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2554(a).
The facts disclose that the appellant met his co-defendants, Macartney and Douglas, while said co-defendants were confined in jail and there agreed to undertake the sale of 1,000 grains of contraband narcotics for $10,000 or $10 per grain. It was further agreed that the proceeds were to be split three ways. In furtherance of the agreement the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Fisk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Hammer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Reyff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Isiah KitchenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. SchlagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Eugene Duvalcourt Walker and Irving Goldheimer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Gary Howard KellermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- George E. Shibley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.