Legal Opinion

Dopazo v. Brookline Rent Control Board

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 18, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This action seeks judicial review of a judge’s reversal of an order by the defendant, Brookline Rent Control Board (“the Board”) denying a Certificate of Exemption to the plaintiff, Angel Dopazo, with respect to the premises located at 36 Davis Avenue, Brookline, Massachusetts.

The record discloses that the plaintiff applied for a Certificate of Exemption with respect to the subject property on February 14,1985, on the basis that it was an “owner-occupied two-family or three-familyhouse” within the meaning of Section 3(b) (5) of Article XXXVIII of the By-Laws of the Town of Brookline, commonly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Trovato v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Kahn v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Fisgeyer v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Wood-Dyer v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orne v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API