Legal Opinion
Satyendranath DAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1994No. 92-15645PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Satyendranath Das appeals the district court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. 789 F.Supp. 324 (1992). The Secretary found that Das’s social security retirement benefits are subject to reduction pursuant to the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), 42 U.S.C. § 415(a)(7). 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
Das was born in India on February 1, 1926. He was employed by the Federal Communications Commission as an electronics engineer for a total of eight years and nine months. These wages…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Vernoff Ex Rel. Vernoff v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ralph Stroup v. Jo Ane B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Linda Larson v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Templeton Coal Co., Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.