Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Burgett
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 30, 1993No. 2-92-322-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOPKINS, Justice.
Jimmy Cleveland Burgett was indicted for delivery of controlled substance. Before his trial, although represented by counsel, he filed a pro se application for writ of habeas corpus which the court denied after a hearing. He immediately appealed this denial. While this appeal was pending, appellant was found guilty as charged.
We dismiss the appeal.
The offense occurred on April 26, 1987. The grand jury indicted appellant for the crime on May 18, 1987. He was not arrested for this offense until April 22, 1992. In July, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ex Parte BanksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ex Parte Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Ex Parte Anthony Charles Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Ex Parte Anthony Charles Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Ex Parte Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.