Legal Opinion

Hammer v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1978No. CA 4900, SC 25640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action challenging the constitutionality of procedures employed by the Oregon State Penitentiary in terminating plaintiff Hammer’s employment as a corrections officer. In Hammer v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 276 Or 651, 556 P2d 1348 (1976) (hereinafter referred to as Hammer I), this court held that Hammer’s dismissal was in violation of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution because plaintiff was not given a pretermination notice of the charges against him nor an opportunity to rebut the charges. The United States Supreme Court granted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Haynes v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Ashman v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Sherris v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Maben v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API