Legal Opinion

Hart v. Bowen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 1986No. 86-7045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Chief Judge:

The sole issue on this appeal is what law of intestate devolution is to be used, as to whether Stephanie W. Hart would be entitled to inherit the personal property of Thomas W. Henderson as an illegitimate child, for the purpose of establishing Hart’s right to Social Security Survivor’s benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(d). The Secretary determined that Hart would not inherit under the Alabama intestacy scheme in effect in 1978 and denied benefits. The district court held this determination to be correct. We affirm.

As an alleged illegitimate child of a fully insured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Carrie J. Cox, for Michael K. Cox, S.S. Nvk-Tp-Ducg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Amanda Handley, by and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Patricia Herron v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Alpha Otis O'Daniel Stephens v. Walter Zant, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hart v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API