State v. Dylan S.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. In these consolidated appeals,1 Dylan S. and Renee B. appeal orders sanctioning them for failing to comply with conditions imposed after they were found to have violated a municipal truancy ordinance. See Wis. Stat. § 938.355(6m)(ag). Dylan and Renee raise multiple arguments regarding the circuit court's sanctions procedure, contending that the court contravened several statutory provisions and violated their due process rights. We agree with Dylan and Renee's argument that the court lacked statutory authority to sanction them because it never entered written dispositional orders after…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Timothy W. Miller v. Angela L. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Timothy W. Miller v. Angela L. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020