Legal Opinion

Monfiston v. Ekelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Steven Monfiston, an infant by his guardian ad litem, Antonio Saint-Vil, and Stevenson Monfiston, plaintiffs in Action No. 1, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated February 5, 1997, as granted the motion of the County of Suffolk for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it in Action No. 1.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that the “liability [of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Harford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santiago v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Schuster v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Stevens v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Iacone v. PassanisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Pensabene v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API