Legal Opinion

Arrott v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1904No. Nos. 16, 21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 633,9¿í, for a dredger for pulverulent material, granted to James W. Arrott, Jr., September 26, 1899, and cross-suit for specific enforcement of an alleged contract for the assignment of such patent to defendant. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

There are before the court for decision cross-suits in equity which have been heard together upon the pleadings and proofs. The original suit was brought by James W. Arrott, Jr., against the Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company, for the infringement of his letters patent No. 633,941, for an improvement in dredgers for pulverulent material, granted to him on September 26 1899. The invention has relation to the sifting and distributing of powdered enameling material on the heated surface of bath tubs and other vessels, accomplished by a pneumatic agitator attached to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. J. D. Mott Iron WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Wayman v. Louis Lipp Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912
  3. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Iron City Sanitary Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  4. Victor Talking Machine Co. v. American Graphophone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API