Legal Opinion

Hooie v. Barksdale

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2012No. 2100924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Marla D. Hooie appeals from the Limestone Circuit Court’s denial of her motion seeking relief from a default judgment entered against her. We affirm the judgment.

In February 1997, Jerry R. Barksdale filed a complaint in the Limestone Circuit Court (“the trial court”) against Hooie, alleging that Hooie owed him $20,548.70 for legal services that Barksdale had performed. After Hooie failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, Barks-dale obtained a default judgment against her in April 1997. The default judgment was not executed within 10 years of its entry. In November 2010,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Allsopp v. Bolding, 1100432 (Ala. 9-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Horizons 2000, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. D.B. v. D.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. Banks v. Estate of WoodallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. McCrory & Williams, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. M.E.W. v. J.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Brixmor GA Springdale/Mobile Limited Partnership v. Klyce Enterprise, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API