Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony D. Paden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2003No. 02-2018PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

I

Anthony Paden pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Over his objection, the district court 2 assigned him a Category IV criminal history based on convictions in two prior cases for armed criminal action, assault in the first degree, and unlawful use of a weapon. On appeal, Paden argues that the district court erred by refusing to consider his prior sentences as related under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 4A1.2(a)(2) because his criminal actions in the prior cases were part of a single common scheme or plan and because the cases were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Kerry Michael KleinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Andre C. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Pamela M. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Terry MauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Dijuane Shante TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Juan Carrillo-BeltranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Thomas Eugene Mills, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Cordova Jamal LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API