Legal Opinion
Darweger v. Staats
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.
We are reviewing two orders of the Broome County Special Term, (1) denying appellants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action, (2) granting an injunction pendente lite restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiff in the operation of his intrastate coal business.
Appellants constitute the Divisional Code Authority, Division No. 3, of the Retail Solid Fuel Industry. The jurisdiction of Division No. 3 extends to the entire State of New York except the counties comprising New York city and those on Long Island. Code of Fair Competition No. 280 for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- People v. C. Klinck Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Brown v. University of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Almroth v. BolandNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. Princeton, Inc.New York City Magistrates' Court · 1935
- de Agostina v. Parkshire Ridge Amusements, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935