Legal Opinion

Almroth v. Boland

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchirick, J.

This is a proceeding, in the nature of prohibition, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to restrain the respondent, the New York State Labor Relations Board, from reopening this matter and holding new hearings, pursuant to its order and notice of hearing, dated April 26, 1939. That order and notice of hearing directs a hearing “ concerning the unfair labor practices alleged in said charge of July 15, 1938 and in paragraphs ‘ 8 ’ and ‘ 9 ’ of the complaint herein, and also in regard to the allegations in paragraphs ‘ 6 ’ and ‘ 10 1 of the complaint herein.”

The able and exhaustive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. People Ex Rel. Unger v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Matter of Wallach's, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. People ex rel. Jones v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barber v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Milonas v. SchwalbNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Sullivan County Steam Co. v. Di FedeNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API