Legal Opinion

State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. Brown

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1988No. 18409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Clifton Brown was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. When Brown was requested to take an evidentiary blood-alcohol test, pursuant to Nevada’s implied consent law, he refused, and his driver’s license was subsequently revoked for the statutory one-year period. As Brown later pleaded guilty, the one-year license revocation was added to the penalties imposed for his DUI conviction.

Brown appealed the revocation of his license to the DUI Adjudicator. The DUI Adjudicator affirmed the revocation, and Brown appealed to the district court. Concluding that Brown’s intoxicated…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. PendleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Galvan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. County of Natrona v. Casper Air ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. FrangulNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. BeckstedNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Guerra v. Hertz Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  4. Ebarb v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API