Rowe v. Cincinnati (City)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.
Harry Rowe, Jr. filed his petition in the Hamilton Appeals asking for an injunction to restrain the City of Cincinnati from enforcing Ordinance No. 289-1925 which make the maintenance of gasoline pumps on the sidewalk a misdemeanor punishable by a $100 fine, and authorizes the city to remove the gasoline pumps that are so placed. The grounds upon which he bases his plea for injunction are that the pumps have been in constant use since 1910 with the express consent of the City and to take them away is in violation of Art. XIV, Sec.
I.US. constitution and Art. I., Sec. 19 Ohio Constitution.
The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Adams v. Commissioners of TrappeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- County of El Dorado v. Al Tahoe Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- McCraney v. City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Di TomasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967