City of Atlanta v. Awtry Lowndes Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Under the zoning ordinance of the City of Atlanta, undertaking establishments, together with other business and uses enumerated as Class U-7, may, under § 93-210 of the Code of the City of Atlanta, be located in any use district; provided such use in such location will in the judgment of the Board of Zoning Appeals substantially serve the public convenience and welfare, and will not substantially and permanently injure the appropriate use of the neighboring property. McCord v. Ed Bond Condon Co., 175 Ga. 667 (165 S.E. 590, 86 A.L.R. 703).
2. Where, under the terms of a city code, a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hyer v. Holmes & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- McCord v. Ed Bond & Condon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Chipstead v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of SuwaneeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Rogers v. Mayor &C. of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Galfas v. AilorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Pruitt v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.