Legal Opinion

Prado v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 31, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal involves interpretation of the statutory provisions governing the Attorney General’s duty to provide representation to a State employee who is sued for money damages for an act in the scope of employment. The appeal also involves the jurisdiction of the trial court before which the suit is pending to review the Attorney General’s denial of representation.

Defendant Harry Pappas is a former Special Assistant to the Commissioner of Labor. On June 7, 2001, Pappas addressed members of the staff of the Office of Wage and Hour…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prado v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Prado v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. Aperuta v. PirrelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API