Legal Opinion

Prado v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 17, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal is before us for the second time. In our first opinion, we held that the Attorney General was required under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act dealing with the representation of State employees, N.J.S.A. 59:10A-1 to -6, to provide representation to defendant, Harry Pappas, a former Special Assistant to the Commissioner of Labor, in four actions brought against him under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to - 42. Prado v. State, 376 N.J.Super. 231, 240-45, 870 A.2d 294 (App.Div.2005). The Supreme…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allard v. EisenhauerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API