Prado v. State
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.
This appeal is before us for the second time. In our first opinion, we held that the Attorney General was required under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act dealing with the representation of State employees, N.J.S.A. 59:10A-1 to -6, to provide representation to defendant, Harry Pappas, a former Special Assistant to the Commissioner of Labor, in four actions brought against him under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to - 42. Prado v. State, 376 N.J.Super. 231, 240-45, 870 A.2d 294 (App.Div.2005). The Supreme…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allard v. EisenhauerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013