Day v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 96, Jan. T., 1914, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1913, No. 6324, quashing petition for writ of alternative mandamus in case of Prank Miles Day and Charles Z. Klauder, copartners trading as Day & Klauder v. Michael J. Ryan, City Solicitor of the City of Philadelphia. Petition for writ of peremptory mandamus.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 96, Jan. T., 1914, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1913, No. 6324, quashing petition for writ of alternative mandamus in case of Prank Miles Day and Charles Z. Klauder, copartners trading as Day & Klauder v. Michael J. Ryan, City Solicitor of the City of Philadelphia. Petition for writ of peremptory mandamus. Sulzberger, P. J., filed the following opinion sur motion to supersede or quash the alternative writ of mandamus : The plaintiffs, Day & Klauder, ask that a peremptory mandamus issue commanding the defendant, Michael J. Eyan, who is the…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
The order refusing a peremptory mandamus is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas.
2Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Skinner Engine Co. v. KouriOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Morganstern Electric Co. v. BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Paddock v. State ex rel. FitzmauriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1916