Palmer v. Medico Dental Building Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is a motion to affirm the judgment based upon a directed verdict in favor of defendants on the ground of appellant’s failure to print or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, as required by section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, any portion of the record sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment.
Appellant’s brief is unusual in form and entirely insufficient to give the court any adequate understanding of the case. Only fragmentary portions of the pleadings are set forth from which it is impossible to determine the issues thereby made, the theory of appellant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Scott v. Hollywood Park Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Bryant v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Chandlee v. McCallaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burns v. Renaker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931