Legal Opinion
Mikkelsen v. Hansen
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 10, 2019No. F072990; F073783PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDetjen, Acting P.J.
*174BACKGROUND
This is a consolidated appeal from a judgment and postjudgment order of the Kern County Superior Court.
Two cul-de-sacs in two separate Bakersfield subdivisions-Amberton and Stockdale Estates-are connected by a pedestrian path. The path's southern Amberton segment lies on a tract that was recorded in 1977 and previously owned and developed by Tenneco Realty Development Corporation (Tenneco). The path's northern Stockdale Estates segment lies on a tract that was recorded in 1981 and also previously owned and developed by Tenneco. In 1978, Tenneco expressly offered to dedicate the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Vasquez v. CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Walter W. v. Jacqueline W.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Friends of the Trails v. BlasiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hilaly v. AllenCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
- Hilaly v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Shenson v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- State Farm General Ins. Co. v. Oetiker, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020