Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Henly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9629PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— Appellees sued appellant in the Monroe-Circuit Court, upon a contract to run an excursion train of cars from Mitchell, in Lawrence county, to Indianapolis, in Marion county, Indiana, and return. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The first was a general paragraph for money had and received for their use; the second was upon the special contract. A demurrer is claimed to have been overruled to each of the paragraphs. A motion to make the first paragraph more specific was also overruled.

The plaintiffs with their complaint filed interrogatories to-be answered by the defendant.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API