Legal Opinion

State v. Robbins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1943No. 27,753PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal upon questions reserved by the State pursuant to the third clause of § 9-2304, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, § 2368, Baldwin’s 1934. There are eleven assignments of error. The first is covered by the second, which asserts that the “court erred in sustaining appellee Herman Robbins’ motion to strike out petition of the state to prohibit attorneys from. participating in the cause.” Assignments from three to nine inclusive present alleged errors in excluding evidence and will be considered together. The tenth assignment is error in sustaining the motion of appellee, made at the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Haughton v. Aetna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Merry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Meeks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API