Legal Opinion

Long v. Leonard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1937No. 26613. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— Plaintiffs instituted this action for the purpose of obtaining a decree enjoining defendants from obstructing a road across defendants’ land, which road plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest had used for many years. It is plaintiffs’ contention that, by prescription, they have acquired the right to use the road or way in question, and cross defendants’ land in going to and from their property. By their answer, defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint, and the cause proceeded to trial before the court sitting without a jury, resulting in a decree in plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Scheller v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Schulenbarger v. JohnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Wasmund v. HarmWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lechman v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. French v. FrenchTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hughes v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Adams v. Skagit CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API