Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1970No. 443PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 6). His appeal raises nine issues.
Delay in preliminary hearing.
Defendant asserts he was not given a preliminary hearing until fifty-two days after his arrest. We cannot determine the factual basis for this contention. The record shows the date of arrest, but does not show when a preliminary hearing was held. Assuming such a delay, it does not benefit defendant. No issue was raised in the trial court concerning this delay. It' has not been preserved for review. State v. Reynolds, 79 N.M. 195, 441…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Raburn v. NashNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. MascarenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Toby Joe Gutierrez v. Dan Moriarty, Warden, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Benally. v. MarcumNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.