Gillett v. Gillett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Appeal from judgment for $50,000 awarded for injuries received by 8-year-old plaintiff through excessive punishment by her stepmother, the defendant.
Defendant stood in loco parentis and was entitled to the same immunity which would attend a natural parent, but no greater (Trudell v. Leatherby, 212 Cal. 678, 682 [300 P. 7]). It is now established as California law that, while a parent is not liable to his child for the results of negligence, he has no immunity with respect to willful torts; that he may administer reasonable punishment with impunity, but when he exceeds that limit and does so…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Wright v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- MacK v. McGrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lombard v. CoryIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Patton v. Royal Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wooden v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.