Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Gillett

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1959No. Civ. 23250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment for $50,000 awarded for injuries received by 8-year-old plaintiff through excessive punishment by her stepmother, the defendant.

Defendant stood in loco parentis and was entitled to the same immunity which would attend a natural parent, but no greater (Trudell v. Leatherby, 212 Cal. 678, 682 [300 P. 7]). It is now established as California law that, while a parent is not liable to his child for the results of negligence, he has no immunity with respect to willful torts; that he may administer reasonable punishment with impunity, but when he exceeds that limit and does so…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wright v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. MacK v. McGrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Lombard v. CoryIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Patton v. Royal Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Wooden v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API