Legal Opinion
Lockhart v. Phenix City Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 14, 1989No. 88-196-CERPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This case is before us on three certified questions, pursuant to Rule 18, A.R.App.P., from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The questions involve damages for the breach of a covenant against encumbrances contained in a warranty deed.
The district court submitted the following statement of facts with its questions:
"This case is a breach of the warranty of title claim brought by the purchaser of land [Homer Lockhart] against the seller/warrantor [Phenix City Investment Company]. The plaintiff originally brought an action in the Circuit Court of Russell County,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Copeland v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Lockhart v. Phenix City Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Smith v. Birmingham Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Mackintosh. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Health Science Products, Inc. v. Taylor (In Re Health Science Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Tammac Corp. v. Miller-MeehanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Blissett v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Patterson v. BrownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992