Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Phenix City Inv. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 1986No. 84-1131PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Homer Lockhart appeals from two orders of the trial court: one vacating a prior order granting Lockhart's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, and the other entering summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Phenix City Investment Company and F. Porter Knowles. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Lockhart filed a complaint in Russell County Circuit Court against Phenix City Investment Company, F. Porter Knowles, and Larry W. Roney for breach of covenants of warranty in a deed and for fraud. By stipulation of the parties, Roney was dismissed. The remaining defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Coker v. FARMERS MUT. EXCHANGECourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Colson v. HardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. King Mines Resort, Inc. v. MALACHI M. & MINERALS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Green v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Water Works v. Consolidated Pub., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API