Legal Opinion

State v. Bevins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1972No. 38096PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is a post conviction proceeding. Defendant was convicted several years ago of breaking and entering into a Hinky Dinky store in- Omaha, Nebraska. He was represented by the assistant public defender and now claims he was inadequately and incompetently represented. The district court refused to vacate defendant’s sentence. We affirm that judgment.

The record reflects that defendant and a brother were caught red-handed while attempting to enter a safe in the store and were apprehended in the building. Defendant states he was too drunk at the time to have the required intent to commit the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tvrz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SchollNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. CainNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. TullyNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API