Legal Opinion

Saunders System of Colorado Springs v. Kelley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 8033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error seeks relief from a judgment recovered against it by the defendant in error in the trial court. In that court plaintiff in error was defendant and defendant in error was plaintiff, and these designations will be used in this opinion.

At the outset we are confronted with questions of law which make a statement of facts on the merits of the ease unnecessary.

1. Defendant in -its brief uses the following language as and for “a specification of the errors relied upon”: “The denial of the motion for a directed verdict is assigned as error and is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. McFarland v. Central Nat. Bank of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Klink v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. McCullough v. SatterthwaitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Murray Hospital v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Johnson v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API