Division of Family Services v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Family Court involving a child guardianship matter. The Division of Family Services (“DFS”) contends that the Family Court erred, as a matter of law, in granting foster parents guardianship over a minor child. DFS argues that, without its consent, foster parents do not have standing to seek or contest custody awards for foster children placed in their homes. DFS also claims that the Family Court erred in relieving the foster parents of the burden of proof on their petition for guardianship. Finally, DFS alleges that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wife (J. F. v. v. Husband (O. W. v. Jr.)Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Solis v. TeaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Stuart Kingston, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Turner v. PannickAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. BranchSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Shepherd v. ClemensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Shepherd v. ClemensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000