Legal Opinion

Stuart Kingston, Inc. v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 12, 1991PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a Court of Chancery decision granting specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The court ruled the buyer had standing to challenge a right of first refusal and that the seller was not bound by the right sought to be exercised by a third party because the right was void as violative of the rule against perpetuities. We agree with the Court of Chancery that the buyer had standing to seek a determination that the right of first refusal was void and that, as a matter of law, the right was not enforceable. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Wilgus v. Salt Pond Investment Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  4. Fitchie v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co. v. Ev3, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Dover Historical Society v. City of Dover Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API