Legal Opinion
Haroche v. Leary
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Courtney MoGroarty, J.
Petitioner, Gilbert D. Haroche, seeks a judgment pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR enjoining, restraining and prohibiting the Police Commissioner from serving summonses upon its employees, and otherwise interfering with the business of petitioner’s corporations, Liberty Travel Service, Inc., et al., for alleged violations of section 5 of the General Business Law (Sabbath Law, formerly Penal Law § 2143).
In essence, although not so stated, the underlying purpose of this proceeding is to obtain a declaration that the business of *192the plaintiff’s corporations is a “work of necessity ”, and as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Reed v. LittletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Reed v. LittletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 206 East 52nd Rest. Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Haroche v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- People v. AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Strickland v. ManiscalcoNew York Supreme Court · 1981