Legal Opinion
Otto v. Specialties, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided September 27, 1974No. DC 73-63-KPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KEADY, Chief Judge.
The court has before it the motion of defendant, Specialties, Inc., for an order to limit the plaintiffs in the character of the evidence which they may present upon trial. For the reasons to follow, we believe that the motion is meritorious and must be sustained.
This diversity action arises out of an accident which occurred at the defendant’s place of business at Olive Branch, Mississippi. Jack M. Otto, plaintiff, a citizen of Tennessee, was at that time employed by Jet Electric Company, a Tennessee concern which often performed various electrical jobs at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 356, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,166 Pete Gomez v. Florida State Employment ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lester Russell v. Wallace BartleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Margaret Louise Breitwieser and James J. Breitwieser v. Kms Industries, Inc., D/B/A Advo SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Palmer v. Anderson Infirmary Benevolent Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Dixon v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Anthony J. Melerine, Jr., Continental Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Sanchez v. GaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Charles A. Ries, III v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.