Legal Opinion
McNeil v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 13-1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wayne McNeil brings suit against his former employer, Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”). McNeil alleges that Defendant Greyhound, through its managers, supervisors, agents, and employees, engaged in gender discrimination, race discrimination, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 951 et seq.1
Defendant Greyhound moves to dismiss McNeil’s complaint in its entirety, with prejudice, under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNeil v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- PAINE v. IKEA HOLDING US, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020