Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Ziegenfuss
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 13, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 468 (1969)
253 A.2d 180
PAUL E. SCHULTZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT ZIEGENFUSS AND JOSEPH S. HOLLAND, SHERIFF OF MERCER COUNTY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 21, 1969.
Decided May 13, 1969.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. Robert M. Dix argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McCarthy, Bacsik, Hicks & Dix, attorneys).
Mr. John J. Barry argued the cause for respondent Robert Ziegenfuss.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.
Is a judgment against two defendants, as individuals, a lien upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Mazzuchelli v. SilberbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- X-L Liquors, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Felice v. FeliceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citibank v. Estate of SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Lewison Bros. v. Washington Savings Bank (In Re Lewison Bros.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- FDIC v. Birchwood BuildersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Fliegel v. SheeranNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Atlantic Mobile Homes, Inc. v. LeFeverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986