Legal Opinion
Olson v. Aretz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1984No. C0-83-1213PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is a legal malpractice case. Plaintiff Olson appeals from an amended judgment which held that neither his attorney, Richard E. Aretz, nor Aretz’s law firm was negligent in the handling of Olson’s dissolution of marriage. Olson contends that: (1) a district court judge committed prejudi cial error in denying a motion to compel discovery of Aretz’s medical history; (2) the trial judge erred in denying his demand for a jury trial; and (3) the trial judge erred in refusing to allow plaintiff's counsel to cross-examine an expert witness concerning the basis of his opinion.
T…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- El Fredo Pizza, Inc. v. Roto-Flex Oven Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Witte v. DesmaraisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. MutschlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Moratzka v. Wencl (In Re Wencl)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.